I've been bitten by a dog. My own dog. Bad enough to require "medical attention." And cause permanent "disfigurement."Sounds pretty bad, right? It really wasn't. Depending on the jurisdiction, however, that could be enough to earn my dog a "vicious dog" label, could force us to move, or could result in my dog losing his life.
But my dog is not vicious by any stretch of the word. Absent extreme circumstances, he would not intentionally bite anyone. He lets children take things from his mouth and sit on him after doing it. When my sister accidentally shut his tail in the car door, he just sat and whined until we extricated his poor tail from its painful prison. My dog did not intentionally bite me. Not for one second did I consider my life to be in danger. In fact, in the brief moment while he was biting down, I was thinking, "Please hurry up and figure out you're biting me so you'll let go, buddy!" But that never matters when dog bites find their way into the media. It also may very well not matter in the eyes of the law.
And that scares me.
Time and time again, I read headlines that go something like this: "Stray dog attacks family pet, then attacks human." The reality is, most of these people are bitten trying to break up the dog fight. Am I saying it is appropriate for dogs to be running around lose, biting leashed dogs? Absolutely not.
What I am saying as that these bites are qualitatively different. They are not indicative at all of a dog's inclination to bite a human. They say nothing about a dog's demeanor around humans. Indeed, often a bitten human cannot conclusively say if his own dog or the stray was the one that actually bit him. Yet the media glosses over that uncomfortable notion. And often times so do animal control agencies.
Media makes no attempt to differentiate between seriousness or intent of dog bites. The general conclusion a casual newsreader/viewer will come to after retaining stories on dog bites is that all bites are terrible and life threatening. There is a second general assumption that all bites that require medical treatment are terrible and life threatening and intentional.
I keep an eye on media reports on dog bites for many reasons. I've noticed that the media may very well report on just about any sort of bite. From a fatality to a nip on the chin. And their headlines certainly aren't going to give you any clues as to the seriousness of the incident. My own dog bite experience could have been a news story. But I hardly consider "Dog Owner Makes Management Error, Receives Well-Deserved Bite" to be a headline of any interest or relevance to my community members.
Humans are delicate. For our size, we are relatively weak and pathetic. We bruise easily. We tear easily. Consequently, even an accidental cuff can cause injury to a human. Look at how dogs play; they chew each other's faces, they constantly use their teeth, they throw each other to the ground. We need to respect that their instinctive behaviors are very different from those of humans.
We really need to give dogs a break. I've been rescuing almost a decade, and I've never received anything but the most minimal of cuffs from a rescue dog (and none from a pit bull type dog). Many of these dogs are dogs that have perfectly good reasons to mistrust humans and, consequently, to defend themselves against humans. But they don't. Yes, there are cases where a dog intentionally inflicts multiple, life-threatening wounds on a human. But those cases are so rare that they are almost negligible. And those incidents almost always reek of human mismanagement and malevolence. Dogs are (wo)man's best friend. Yes, even dogs that "bite."
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Debunking the Myth Part I: "pit bulls" as weapons
Opposition's Logic: the law has convicted criminals of using "pit bulls" as weapons --> weapons are dangerous --> therefore "pit bulls" are dangerous.
Why it's wrong:
This logic presents a basic misunderstanding of the law, including the legal definition of a "weapon." Here's Washington state's definition of a "deadly weapon":
Any explosive or loaded or unloaded firearm, and ... any other weapon, device, instrument, article, or substance, including a “vehicle” as defined in this section, which, under the circumstances in which it is used, attempted to be used, or threatened to be used, is readily capable of causing death or substantial bodily harm. RCW 9A.04.110(6)
Arkansas has a similar definition:
A deadly weapon is defined as “anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious physical injury.”Ark.Code Ann. § 5–1–102(4)(B)
"Weapons specifically listed in a statute and those with known dangerous qualities are generally characterized as deadly or dangerous per se, or deadly or dangerous as a matter of law, and require little or no proof to support a classification as such a weapon." 124 A.L.R.5th 657. These items include things like firearms, clubs, knives, and axes. But not dogs. And not "pit bulls."
"There are other objects which, while not deadly or dangerous per se, may, under certain circumstances, be likely to cause death or serious injury. Such objects require proof in each case tending to show that the instruments or objects were dangerous or deadly in the manner used by the defendant. In determining whether an instrument not inherently deadly or dangerous assumes these characteristics, a court may consider: (1) the size and nature of the weapon or instrument; (2) the manner in which it was used, possessed, or carried; (3) the size and strength of the party using it; (4) the intent of the user; (5) the person on whom it was used; (6) the offense or crime in the commission of which it was used; and (7) the capability of the instrument to inflict death or serious bodily injury." 124 A.L.R.5th 657.
None of us can really dispute that many dogs are large enough to be capable of causing serious bodily injury or death. But that simply isn't enough to label a dog as a "deadly weapon." It is clear from both statutory and case law that human behavior and mental state and the critical components in these analyses. Indeed, it is the criminal conviction of a human being that is at issue in these cases.
Pit bull type dogs are most certainly not the only type of dog that presents itself in these cases. Indeed, no Court interpretation of statutory law contemplates applying the "deadly weapon" designation to only pit bull type dogs. To draw such a conclusion is to reach far beyond any legal interpretation. It can only be concluded that such statements are inherently flawed, and presented with the hope that listeners will not understand enough about the law to recognize the bluff.
Don't let this half-baked assertion fool you. When dogs are adjudicated as "weapons" in a court case, the commentary is about the dog's handler and not about the dog. The dogs in these cases are victims of violent, criminal owners -- tools manipulated for the owner's gain. We need to direct our focus squarely on dog owners and handlers, as this is where it belongs.
This logic presents a basic misunderstanding of the law, including the legal definition of a "weapon." Here's Washington state's definition of a "deadly weapon":
Any explosive or loaded or unloaded firearm, and ... any other weapon, device, instrument, article, or substance, including a “vehicle” as defined in this section, which, under the circumstances in which it is used, attempted to be used, or threatened to be used, is readily capable of causing death or substantial bodily harm. RCW 9A.04.110(6)
Arkansas has a similar definition:
A deadly weapon is defined as “anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious physical injury.”Ark.Code Ann. § 5–1–102(4)(B)
"Weapons specifically listed in a statute and those with known dangerous qualities are generally characterized as deadly or dangerous per se, or deadly or dangerous as a matter of law, and require little or no proof to support a classification as such a weapon." 124 A.L.R.5th 657. These items include things like firearms, clubs, knives, and axes. But not dogs. And not "pit bulls."
"There are other objects which, while not deadly or dangerous per se, may, under certain circumstances, be likely to cause death or serious injury. Such objects require proof in each case tending to show that the instruments or objects were dangerous or deadly in the manner used by the defendant. In determining whether an instrument not inherently deadly or dangerous assumes these characteristics, a court may consider: (1) the size and nature of the weapon or instrument; (2) the manner in which it was used, possessed, or carried; (3) the size and strength of the party using it; (4) the intent of the user; (5) the person on whom it was used; (6) the offense or crime in the commission of which it was used; and (7) the capability of the instrument to inflict death or serious bodily injury." 124 A.L.R.5th 657.
None of us can really dispute that many dogs are large enough to be capable of causing serious bodily injury or death. But that simply isn't enough to label a dog as a "deadly weapon." It is clear from both statutory and case law that human behavior and mental state and the critical components in these analyses. Indeed, it is the criminal conviction of a human being that is at issue in these cases.
Pit bull type dogs are most certainly not the only type of dog that presents itself in these cases. Indeed, no Court interpretation of statutory law contemplates applying the "deadly weapon" designation to only pit bull type dogs. To draw such a conclusion is to reach far beyond any legal interpretation. It can only be concluded that such statements are inherently flawed, and presented with the hope that listeners will not understand enough about the law to recognize the bluff.
Don't let this half-baked assertion fool you. When dogs are adjudicated as "weapons" in a court case, the commentary is about the dog's handler and not about the dog. The dogs in these cases are victims of violent, criminal owners -- tools manipulated for the owner's gain. We need to direct our focus squarely on dog owners and handlers, as this is where it belongs.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Why Would Anyone Choose a "Pit Bull"?
Too many times, I've seen the following sentiment proffered by people totally ignorant about pit bull type dogs: "There are hundreds of other breeds of dogs to choose from; why do people keep choosing to own this breed?? It says a lot about them that they want a dog with the reputation a pit bull has"
By its very structure and content, this question is illogical. The suggestion is blandly hypocritical that a preference for another breed is fine while a preference for a bully breed qualifies as the eighth deadly sin. While I cannot speak to all the reasons people choose "pit bulls," as they are potentially endless and peppered with subtleties, I will speak here on the major factors I've found when talking to folks via my rescue and advocacy work.
1. There are an awful lot of "pit bulls" in shelters.
There is a huge need for people to give "pit bull" type dogs good homes! Some shelters are identifying over 50 percent of their adoptable dogs as "pit bulls"; thus, statistically, you are more likely to enter a shelter and have a positive experience with a "pit bull" type dog. Of course, most of the "pit bulls" adopted from shelters are mixes, and very few people who adopt "pit bulls," have adopted purebred American Pit Bull Terriers or American Staffordshire Terriers.
2. Personality first, then "pit bull."
Believe it or not, many people are smart enough to look for a personality match rather than a breed preference - or at least prior to determining a breed preference. And it's hard to resist a tail-wagging, face-licking pit bull type dog flashing you that ear-to-ear "pit bull" grin. As is often said, "my dog picked me, not the other way around!" Most "pit bulls" are very endearing dogs, and they will wiggle their way right into your heart - and home. I know many folks who discovered after adopting a pit bull type dog the ostracizing effect that owning one can have; generally, though, this hateful backlash caused these owners to become breed advocates. How can you not fight for an animal you know personally and love deeply?
3. A preference for a "pit bull" is just like a preference for a "poodle."
I like tall dogs. On exterior alone, I'd adopt a well-conformed standard poodle or doberman pinscher before any other dog. So? It's not a sin to like a blocky head, a solid body, or a gorgeous, short-haired coat. Of course, I am a realist, and pick tall dogs that have personalities that fit my lifestyle and family dynamic. But, if you don't like the look of a poodle, or a pit bull, or a golden retriever, then you're probably not going to go out of your way to choose one.
4. You can't have just one.
Due to one of the reasons above, or perhaps a different one, many people have adopted a "pit bull," loved that dog, and had that love returned a hundredfold. So, when it is time to adopt a new dog, they want another dog just like the first. So they gravitate toward the same breed. I grew up with two brittany spaniels - the first one worked for our family, so we didn't mess with a good thing.
5. Bad intentions are not specific to "pit bull" type dogs.
Unfortunately, there will always be individuals who purchase dogs to keep socially isolated at the end of a chain, or to fight, or to cram in their purses as little status symbols. But these people are not necessarily drawn only to pit bull type dogs. And it certainly is not the fault of any breed that it is chosen to be abused and tormented.
On a final note, I do agree that it says a lot about a person when that person chooses to adopt a "pit bull." When folks come looking to adopt a "pit bull," I see generous, kind human beings willing to give a dog a chance who was not given a chance right from the start. I see people not afraid to battle stereotypes and rude remarks, and to stand up for what they believe is right. I see canine advocates, loving parents, intelligent professionals. I see myself.
I love all dogs. When folks come to me and describe what they're looking for in a dog, I usually suggest considering a pit bull type dog. They need adopters, and they, like all breeds, are flexible and varied in their personalities. A "pit bull" isn't always the best match for a family, and I will always respect that. But when people ask me: Why a "pit bull?" I always answer:
"Why not?"
By its very structure and content, this question is illogical. The suggestion is blandly hypocritical that a preference for another breed is fine while a preference for a bully breed qualifies as the eighth deadly sin. While I cannot speak to all the reasons people choose "pit bulls," as they are potentially endless and peppered with subtleties, I will speak here on the major factors I've found when talking to folks via my rescue and advocacy work.
1. There are an awful lot of "pit bulls" in shelters.
There is a huge need for people to give "pit bull" type dogs good homes! Some shelters are identifying over 50 percent of their adoptable dogs as "pit bulls"; thus, statistically, you are more likely to enter a shelter and have a positive experience with a "pit bull" type dog. Of course, most of the "pit bulls" adopted from shelters are mixes, and very few people who adopt "pit bulls," have adopted purebred American Pit Bull Terriers or American Staffordshire Terriers.
2. Personality first, then "pit bull."
Believe it or not, many people are smart enough to look for a personality match rather than a breed preference - or at least prior to determining a breed preference. And it's hard to resist a tail-wagging, face-licking pit bull type dog flashing you that ear-to-ear "pit bull" grin. As is often said, "my dog picked me, not the other way around!" Most "pit bulls" are very endearing dogs, and they will wiggle their way right into your heart - and home. I know many folks who discovered after adopting a pit bull type dog the ostracizing effect that owning one can have; generally, though, this hateful backlash caused these owners to become breed advocates. How can you not fight for an animal you know personally and love deeply?
3. A preference for a "pit bull" is just like a preference for a "poodle."
I like tall dogs. On exterior alone, I'd adopt a well-conformed standard poodle or doberman pinscher before any other dog. So? It's not a sin to like a blocky head, a solid body, or a gorgeous, short-haired coat. Of course, I am a realist, and pick tall dogs that have personalities that fit my lifestyle and family dynamic. But, if you don't like the look of a poodle, or a pit bull, or a golden retriever, then you're probably not going to go out of your way to choose one.
4. You can't have just one.
Due to one of the reasons above, or perhaps a different one, many people have adopted a "pit bull," loved that dog, and had that love returned a hundredfold. So, when it is time to adopt a new dog, they want another dog just like the first. So they gravitate toward the same breed. I grew up with two brittany spaniels - the first one worked for our family, so we didn't mess with a good thing.
5. Bad intentions are not specific to "pit bull" type dogs.
Unfortunately, there will always be individuals who purchase dogs to keep socially isolated at the end of a chain, or to fight, or to cram in their purses as little status symbols. But these people are not necessarily drawn only to pit bull type dogs. And it certainly is not the fault of any breed that it is chosen to be abused and tormented.
On a final note, I do agree that it says a lot about a person when that person chooses to adopt a "pit bull." When folks come looking to adopt a "pit bull," I see generous, kind human beings willing to give a dog a chance who was not given a chance right from the start. I see people not afraid to battle stereotypes and rude remarks, and to stand up for what they believe is right. I see canine advocates, loving parents, intelligent professionals. I see myself.
I love all dogs. When folks come to me and describe what they're looking for in a dog, I usually suggest considering a pit bull type dog. They need adopters, and they, like all breeds, are flexible and varied in their personalities. A "pit bull" isn't always the best match for a family, and I will always respect that. But when people ask me: Why a "pit bull?" I always answer:
"Why not?"
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Get to Know Some "Pit Bull" Heroes...86 of them!
We've all read the horror stories, now read the hero stories! Jeff Theman, producer of the documentary "Guilty Til Proven Innocent," and I have been keeping tabs on media reports of brave "pit bull" type dogs, and here are the stories we've found! We'll update this list as new stories come in. Enjoy!
(please note this is the temporary home for these stories; we will be moving the collection to our new advocacy site in the next few months!)
7/27/11 http://www.wzzm13.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=107779
- ASSAULT - Blitz saves woman from husband. (1)
7/27/11 http://www.fox28.com/Global/story.asp?S=12777922#.TjCekfrdUxM.facebook
- FIRE - Thor alerts family of house fire. (2)
http://www.wane.com/dpp/news/indiana/pit-bull-saves-ind-family-from-fire
- See above (not posted)
http://www.wndu.com/hometop/headlines/98083109.html
- see above (not posted)
7/27/11 http://www.newson6.com/story/10397551/protective-pit-bull-wins-dog-of-valor-award?redirected=true#.TjCfAYV7hhk.facebook
- ATTEMPTED ROBBERY - DBoy takes 3 bullets from intruder, saves family, wins
award. (3)
http://www.news9.com/story/9494086/family-dog-takes-bullet-to-save-family?redirected=true
- See above (not posted)
7/27/11 http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Diamond-the-Hero-Dog-121291194.html
- FIRE - Diamond alerts family of house fire, presented award. (4)
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/05/04/pit-bull-named-spcalas-hero-dog-of-the-year/
- See above...(not posted)
http://www.wbaltv.com/video/27798107/detail.html
- See above...(not posted)
http://www.wlbz2.com/news/article/158379/108/Pit-bull-saves-family-from-fire-but-cant-find-new-home
- See above (not posted)
http://www.ktvu.com/news/25986606/detail.html
- see above...(not posted)
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/los_angeles&id=8113149
- see above (not posted)
http://www.wbir.com/news/article/162028/141/Hero-dog-now-homeless-because-shes-a-pit-bull
- see above (not posted)
7/28/11 http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=6625698
- LAW ENFORCEMENT - Elliot Ness helps Chicago (Cook County Sheriff's Office) in
cadaver sniffing. (5)
http://cookcountysheriff.org/press_page/press_k9pressRelease_01_26_09.html
- see above (posted press release)
7/28/11 http://www.king5.com/news/local/Pitbull-on-Patrol-88957032.html
- LAW ENFORCEMENT - Neville helps Washington State Patrol in drug and bomb
sniffing. (6)
7/28/11 http://www.ci.milwaukie.or.us/police/milwaukies-new-k-9-goes-prime-time
- LAW ENFORCEMENT - Shaka introduced to Milwaukie, Oregon Police Department for
drug sniffing (press release only). (7)
7/28/11 http://www.cbp.gov/xp/CustomsToday/2002/October/k9.xml
- LAW ENFORCEMENT - Popsicle helps US Customs in drug sniffing (press release
only). (8)
7/29/11 http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20090710/BREAKING/907109958
- ATTEMPTED ROBBERY - (Unnamed Pit Bull dog) saves family. (10)
7/29/11 http://www.wkbw.com/news/local/19117029.html
- ASSAULT - Lily saves owner from boyfriend. (11)
7/29/11 http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_EECJdu49NXvQGyUZd3D0WP#.TjN8FFff8ic
- ASSAULT - Blue saves 7 year old girl from sexual assault by Perv. (12)
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2007/07/07/2007-07-07_pit_bull_saves_girl_from_perv.html
- See above (not posted).
7/29/11 http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=6690057
- FIRE - Ace alerts family of fire. (13)
7/30/11 http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2008/08/pit-bull-saves.html
- SAVES KITTENS - Angel saves a litter of kittens. (14)
7/30/11 http://www.katu.com/news/local/99553644.html
- FIRE - Grizzly wakes family up and saves from fire. (15)
http://www.kboi2.com/news/local/99575089.html
- see above (not posted)
7/30/11 http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_4095627
- SAVES BOY - Destiny saves boy from potential abducter. (16)
7/30/11 http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/24466747/detail.html
- SAVES DOG - 2 unnamed Pit Bulls save Chihauhua from coyote attack. (17)
7/31/11 http://www.click2houston.com/news/11702190/detail.html
- FIRE - Unnamed Pit Bull saves family of 6 from house fire. (18)
7/31/11 http://www.ksla.com/story/3538217/pit-bull-alerts-owner-to-house-fire?redirected=true
- FIRE - Stormy alerts family of fire. (19)
7/31/11 http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20100820owner_dog_was_my_hero_during_knife_attack/
- ASSAULT - Princess saves owner from boyfriend knife attack. (20)
7/31/11 http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Pit-Bull-Saves-Family-of-Five.html
- FIRE - Jasmine saves family from house fire. (21)
8/1/11 http://www.wsbradio.com/news/news/pit_bull_saves_owner_from_atta/nmG5/
- ASSAULT - Unnamed Pit Bull stops boyfriend from attacking woman. (22)
8/1/11 http://youtu.be/b0dtuW_BjgU
- THERAPY - Grant the library dog, listens to kids read. (23)
8/2/11 http://www.cbs12.com/video/v/73356775001/wpec-localnews
- ROBBERY - Victor scares off an alleged car jacker. (24)
8/3/11 http://www.cbs12.com/video/v/73356775001/wpec-localnews
- SNIFFING DOG -Layla, the peanut sniffing Pit Bull (finds peanuts for life
threatening allergy). (25)
8/4/11 http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-07-27/news/29836879_1_pit-bull-puppy-cheyenne-divine-intervention
- SAVING SUICIDE - Cheyenne saves military vet from suicide. (26)
8/5/11 http://www.kktv.com/home/headlines/Dogs_Bitten_Alert_Family_to_Rattlesnake_126814898.html#.Tjy7NgRV_6s
- SAVES CHILD - Layla (Pit Bull) and Jackson (GSD) alert family of rattlesnake
where 3 year old son was playing. (27)
8/6/11 http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/video?id=7453902&syndicate=syndicate§ion
- FIRE - Baby saves owner and 2 dozen cats and dogs at humane society from
fire. (28)
8/7/11 http://addins.kwwl.com/blogs/cubbietails/2010/08/pit-bull-saves-woman-and-child-from-attacker
- ASSAULT - Unnamed Pit Bull saves woman and child from attacker. (29)
8/9/11 http://www.necn.com/Boston/New-England/2009/02/19/Hero-dog-saves-11-from-burning/1235087866.html
- FIRE - Chaos saves 11 people from house fire. He unfortunately died in it.
(30)
8/10/11 http://www.wlbt.com/story/6602471/pit-bull-emerges-hero-in-house-fire#.TkMu18sZYMU
- FIRE - Pepper saves family from fire and 4 other dogs too. (31)
8/11/11 http://www.12newsnow.com/story/13181115/family-dog-saves-family-as-home-burns-to-ground?redirected=true#.TkSSKG-UfjN
- FIRE - Unnamed Pit Bull saves family from mobile home fire. He and another
dog dies in it. (32)
8/12/11 http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/local/pit-bulls-go-to-work-as-therapy-dogs
- THERAPY - Group of therapy Pit Bulls (Luv a Bull) visit children. (33)
8/12/11 http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/category/watch-listen/video-on-demand/?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=5129010&flvUri&partnerclipid
- THERAPY - Leo (former Vick dog) visits cancer patients in hospitals. (34)
http://www.11alive.com/life/pets/story.aspx?storyid=117374
- see above (posted)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25214356/ns/health-pet_health/t/beaten-down-dog-vick-case-has-his-day/
- see above (posted)
8/13/11 http://www.rrdailyherald.com/news/pit-bull-visit-lifts-police-spirits/article_4046bece-8e1b-550e-8c1d-edb1b5f71929.html
- THERAPY - Elle visits Police Officers to lift spirits. (35)
8/14/11 http://sdnews.com/bookmark/9096640/article-Rescued+Pit+Bull+Gives+Back+to+Community+as+Therapy+Dog#.TkhO39AhJIg
- THERAPY - Cody, born deformed, gives back to community. (36)
8/15/11 http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=828240
- THERAPY - Ruby the therapy dog, battles cancer. She also has a book about
her. (37)
8/16/11 http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/local_news/Pit-bull's-special-brand-of-therapy-in-demand
- THERAPY - Jasmine spreads joy at assisted living homes. (38)
8/17/11 http://articles.philly.com/1996-08-11/news/25644395_1_muffin-pet-therapy-pit-bull
- THERAPY - Muffin the therapy dog. (39)
8/18/11 http://www.wtae.com/r/18337664/detail.html#.Tk2SIpDiB7I
- THERAPY - Abby (owned by one of our interviews Maria Johnston) visits
assisted living homes. (40)
8/19/11 http://www2.turnto10.com/news/2010/jul/23/pit-bull-joins-police-search-and-rescue-team-ar-162259/
- SAR - Unnamed Pit Bull search and rescue dog. (41)
8/20/11 http://www2.wjbf.com/lifestyles/2008/dec/06/investigators_pit_bull_stabbed_to_death_while_defe-ar-222176/
- ASSAULT - Maximus saves owner from an attack by brother in law. He was
stabbed to death in the process. (42)
8/21/11 http://www.news4jax.com/news/18837417/detail.html
- ATTEMPTED ROBERRY - Man (dogs name) scares off intruders during home
invasion, gets shot, loses leg. (43)
8/22/11 http://www.wtoc.com/Global/story.asp?S=2872940
- FIRE - Otis saves family from fire. (44)
8/23/11 http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=6560000
- ATTEMPTED ROBBERY - Kola chases burgular, gets hurt. (45)
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=6560000
- see above (posted)
http://abcnews.go.com/US/AmazingAnimals/story?id=7587664&page=1#.TlROu9vgCfU
- see above (posted)
8/24/11 http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Dog-is-best-friend-for-a-cat-in-trouble-917837.php
- SAVE KITTENS - Phoebe saves a litter of kittens. (46)
8/25/11 http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/12/13/1197135649329.html
- SAVES CHILD - Unnamed Pit Bull/Rottweiler mix saves boy from drowning. (47)
8/26/11 https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10150313035814124
- THERAPY - Rocco the therapy dog (video is only on facebook). (48)
8/27/11 http://www.time.com/time/video/player/0,32068,671301612001_2030797,00.html
- SAVES OWNER FROM SUICIDE - Cheyene helps former military vet cope with PTSD.
(49)
8/28/11 http://abcnews.go.com/US/video/family-dogs-saves-girl-fox-attack-12249930#.Tlro-pN3KJ8
- SAVES GIRL FROM FOX - Abby (Pit Bull) and Callie (Bassett Hound) save human
sister from fox attack. (50)
8/29/11 http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/Dog-used-in-fights-becomes-therapy-helper-at-Berea-nursing-facility
- THERAPY - Gremlin visits nursing homes. (51)
8/30/11 http://www.phil-islands.com/pit-bull-terrier-dog-saves-2-women-from-deadly-cobra
- SAVES WOMEN FROM COBRA - Chief saves 2 women from cobra. (52)
8/31/11 http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Articles/HeroicPitties/CocotheHeroMay05.pdf
- ATTEMPTED ROBBERY/ASSAULT - Coco chases intruder out of house. (53)
9/1/11 http://montclair.patch.com/articles/thankful-for-life-and-giving-back
- THERAPY - Shelby teach kids about bullying. (54)
http://news.yahoo.com/students-talk-bullying-profiling-author-joe-dwyer-20110213-070100-428.html
- see above (posted)
http://www.belladogmagazine.com/book-reviews/301-shelbys-grace-shelby-an-abused-pit-bull-finds-a-purpose-to-her-life-as-a-therapy-dog-after-being-rescued-from-a-shelter
- see above (posted) (Pit Bull on cover of Bella Dog)
http://finance.bnet.com/bnet/news/read?GUID=16964650
- see above (posted)
9/2/11 http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9F01E0D7163EEE3ABC4F53DFB166838A639EDE
- Stubby (pdf of newspaper article). (55)
9/8/11 http://www.woio.com/story/15414604/good-boy-dog-bites-attacker-helps-owner-get-away#.Tmlainf_iYE
-ASSAULT - Cash fends off attacker. (56)
http://www.fox8.com/news/wjw-dog-protects-pregnant-owner-from-attacker-elyria-txt,0,5995285.story
- see above (posted)
9/10/11 http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/video?id=7915616&syndicate=syndicate§ion
- THERAPY - Sarge the therapy dog, also dog that inspired Elderbull name. (57)
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2011/02/03/free-spay-and-neuter-for-pit-bulls-and-pit-bull-mixes/
- see above (posted)
9/25/11 http://www.wtae.com/r/29297655/detail.html#.Tn_fGoLgm-w
- SAVES ELDERLY WHO FELL DOWN - Cobain saves elderly woman who fell down hill.
(58)
11/4/2011 http://www.khou.com/news/local/HFD-Pit-bull-credited-with-saving-family-from-burning-home-133231848.html
- pit bull saves family from house fire (59)
11/14/2011 http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=8430744
- pit bull saves family from deadly carbon monoxide leak (60)
April, 2011 http://bslnews.org/2011/04/11/meet-gladys-another-pit-bull-hero/
(Gladys saves baby bunnies) (61)
11/18/2011 http://www.fox23news.com/news/local/story/Pit-bull-saves-owner-from-fast-moving-fire/Ordn4wIIPEeWDqokgRrObQ.cspx?autoplay=1
(Bully Boy saves family from fire) (62)
11/23/2011 http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11327/1191774-57-0.stm?cmpid=localstate.xml
- Nola visits classrooms and helps children with their reading (63)
11/27/2011 http://www.whas11.com/news/local/Fire-damages-Louisville-home--134555673.html
- dogs (at least one is a pit bull) alert man to a fire in his home. (64)
12/05/2011 http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/222998/
Casey a pit bull lab mix works as a therapy dog (65)
2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtAue-USGOc&feature=share
(Rico, shot point blank to defend friends from a robber) (double check we don’t
have this one) (66)
12/21/2011 http://www.fox40.com/news/headlines/ktxl-family-pitbull-helps-cops-put-car-thief-in-the-dog-house-20111220,0,1974295.story
pit bull helps capture car thief (67)
12/22/2011 http://mobile.nola.com/advnola/pm_29227/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=RLPMwpZI
(pit bull foils robbery) (68)
1/17/12 http://www.wtae.com/r/30221399/detail.html
(Diamond woke her owner when a fire started in his apartment) (69)
2/3/2012 http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/breaking/Search-Under-Way-for-Missing-Canton-Girl-138605279.html
(little girl wanders, pit bull credited with her safe return) (70)
2/7/2012 http://www.whiotv.com/news/news/local/pit-bull-saved-my-life-dayton-woman-says/nHXMm/
(Rella the pit bull took a bullet to protect her owner in a domestic dispute;
incident happened in January, reported now) (71)
2/8/2012 http://www.cbs19.tv/story/16768688/2012/02/08/web-exclusive
(pit bull alerts family to fire) (72)
2/8/2012 http://www.wreg.com/news/wreg-panola-co-grandfather-believes-family-pitbull-saved-his-grandson-20120208,0,6859883.story?track=rss
(Sugar the pit bull keeps two year old Colby safe and leads rescuers to him)
(73)2.10.2012 http://www.fox5vegas.com/story/16912332/las-vegas-man-grieves-for-his-canine-heroes (pit bull and Chihuahua alert owner to fire, both pets perish) (74)
3.2.2012 http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Robbers+shoot+defending+home/6240011/story.html (Rumbler, an American Staffordshire Terrier mix defends his home from a robbery)(75)
4.3.2012 http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/04/11016409-hero-pit-bull-takes-bullet-during-home-invasion (Kilo the "pit bull" takes a bullet to save his family during a home invasion) (76)
http://www.dogheirs.com/larne/posts/850-pitbull-and-twelve-year-old-girl-help-save-unconscious-drowning-stray (pit bull and pre-teen save a drowning dog) (77)
4.18.12 http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/04/09/3871481/robber-kills-pit-bull-as-it-defends.html#article (pit bull defends home from a burglary, loses life) (78)
5.1.12 http://guardian-messenger.whereilive.com.au/news/story/edwardstown-home-saved-by-a-star-1/ (American Staffordshire Terrier defends home from thief) (79)
5.8.12 http://now.msn.com/now/0509-dog-saves-owner.aspx (pit bull pulls her owner off a set of train tracks after the owner unexpectedly collapsed unconscious. The dog was hit by a train during her heroic efforts, but survived!) (80)
6.27.12 http://www.krem.com/home/Family-dog-shot-three-times-during-Spokane-home-invasion-160507555.html (Guardian defends his home from a robbery, incurring several gun shot wounds in the process) (81)
7.9.12 http://www.13abc.com/story/18976318/2012/07/08/family-lives-in-tent-after-storm (pit bull saves owner from falling tree during a storm) (82)
7.9.12 http://www.wlox.com/story/18985101/tales-of-pit-bull-heroism (pit bull donates blood to help other dogs in need) (83)
7.9.12 http://www.newsleader.com/article/20120722/NEWS01/307220007/One-man-s-best-friend?odyssey=nav%7Chead (Boss the pit bull saves wheelchair-bound owner from an armed robbery) (84)
7.20.12 http://www.dogheirs.com/tamara/posts/1555-loyal-pit-bull-saves-mother-and-child-from-home-invader (Ruger saves family from a home invasion!) (85)
8.10.12 http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2012/09/report_pit_bull_alerts_owner_o.html (pit bull wakes owner and saves him from a fire) (86)
Saturday, February 4, 2012
Advocates Beware: some tactics are counterproductive
Being a "pit bull" advocate is like tiptoeing through an active minefield - you have to watch where you step or you're going to detonate something explosive. Ultimately, I do think we need to cut each other some slack: What we do is incredibly precise, challenging work. Even the best advocates can't be "on" all the time.
I certainly do not believe I know everything there is to know about "pit bulls" and how to best help them. I will never stop learning about this topic. The law and our culture are living entities. They evolve, so I evolve.
I do feel, however, that the following tactics are ineffective and possibly damaging to the movement. I see these crop up all over the place and, worse, I frequently see them used as weapons by anti-pit bull groups and spokespeople, in legal forums and otherwise. I urge folks to think about these points and how they can be revamped as or substituted for more effective advocacy tools.
1. The bait and switch: I've often heard folks complain about a factual inaccuracy that the opposition has made about "pit bulls," but then seen these folks substitute their own pit bull favorable, albeit also false or unsupported fact.
e.g. poodles are actually the breed of dog that bites most commonly (really? where is the information to support that allegation? And way to piss off poodle owners, owners like me) or "pit bulls are the most bred dog in the US" (I've never seen this fact and it's impossible to maintain with any level of authority since "pit bull" isn't a breed, and the word isn't uniformly defined, and there is no database containing information on "pit bulls." In AKC and UKC registrations, Am Staffs don't even come in in the top 10). Why it is acceptable to pick apart the oppositions' facts but hold scrutiny of pro-"pit bull" facts to a different standard is beyond me.
Without reliable research or authority to support a fact, don't use it.
2. The 'raise them well': "Raise them to be aggressive and they'll be aggressive." Well, probably not. This argument is problematic for a few reasons: (1) "Aggression" is an oft-misunderstood term. "aggressive" acts can range from a subtle movement to a bark or growl to a serious bite. All dogs aggress. Serious, violent dog-directed or human-directed "aggression" is not an adaptive trait and is no dog breed has a propensity for these behaviors; (2) This argument does not help change discriminatory policies in shelters that don't allow "pit bulls" to be adopted out, and does not encourage folks to rescue "pit bulls" either. So, untold numbers of these dogs continue dying in our shelters. Since the point is to save their lives, we should probably think about what we're saying about the dogs most in need of our help - the ones not raised in loving, responsible environments since puppyhood.
A better phrase would be something to the tune of: a dog's environment and owner management impacts a dog's behavior.
3. The elitist: Pit bulls are the best dog ever! No, they're not. Don't get me wrong, I've met some amazing "pit bulls" via my rescue and advocacy work, but I've also met some annoying or otherwise distateful (to me) ones that I'd never want in my home. Same goes for every breed (and mixes too!) out there. Dogs are individuals and the goals of fighting breed discriminatory laws are to put them on an even playing field, not a pedestal. Pointing out that they're the "best" makes it seem as though they're different. And the reason BDL exists and is upheld is because the argument that they are different has held up in court and convinced lawmakers!)
4. The mudslinger: Picking on other breeds. My question is always: Why? Most people in the US do not own "pit bulls," even if they are incredibly popular. So why are we alienating other dog owners? BDL really is a dog issue not a "pit bull" issue, and the more non-pit bull owning folks we can get on our side, the better. It makes the movement generalizable and more credible. Plus, we don't need to bring down other breeds in order to save the "pit bull." Finally, we never know what the impact of allegations on other breeds might bring: what if someone picked up on our negative statements and then tried to ban a different breed?
5. The historian: Discussing or Debating the "history" of the "pit bull" is problematic as this topic is conentious and not set in stone, even among knowledgeable advocates. Part of the problem is that we still don't know what a "pit bull" is today, needless to say how it was defined 100-200 years ago. Allegations of Nanny Dogs and fighting dogs and working dogs fly around wildly. But, quite frankly, it doesn't matter at all what the history of the breed is. Most breeds have evolved in a totally different direction than their history indicates. Plus, it's entirely possible to change the inclinations of an animal in just a few generations, as shown in the Russian fox experiments. So, for the purpose of fighting breed discriminatory laws, history is a red herring. Leave it be, or risk alienating other advocates who have a different opinion on the "pit bull's" origins and who might otherwise have been allied with you.
I certainly do not believe I know everything there is to know about "pit bulls" and how to best help them. I will never stop learning about this topic. The law and our culture are living entities. They evolve, so I evolve.
I do feel, however, that the following tactics are ineffective and possibly damaging to the movement. I see these crop up all over the place and, worse, I frequently see them used as weapons by anti-pit bull groups and spokespeople, in legal forums and otherwise. I urge folks to think about these points and how they can be revamped as or substituted for more effective advocacy tools.
1. The bait and switch: I've often heard folks complain about a factual inaccuracy that the opposition has made about "pit bulls," but then seen these folks substitute their own pit bull favorable, albeit also false or unsupported fact.
e.g. poodles are actually the breed of dog that bites most commonly (really? where is the information to support that allegation? And way to piss off poodle owners, owners like me) or "pit bulls are the most bred dog in the US" (I've never seen this fact and it's impossible to maintain with any level of authority since "pit bull" isn't a breed, and the word isn't uniformly defined, and there is no database containing information on "pit bulls." In AKC and UKC registrations, Am Staffs don't even come in in the top 10). Why it is acceptable to pick apart the oppositions' facts but hold scrutiny of pro-"pit bull" facts to a different standard is beyond me.
Without reliable research or authority to support a fact, don't use it.
2. The 'raise them well': "Raise them to be aggressive and they'll be aggressive." Well, probably not. This argument is problematic for a few reasons: (1) "Aggression" is an oft-misunderstood term. "aggressive" acts can range from a subtle movement to a bark or growl to a serious bite. All dogs aggress. Serious, violent dog-directed or human-directed "aggression" is not an adaptive trait and is no dog breed has a propensity for these behaviors; (2) This argument does not help change discriminatory policies in shelters that don't allow "pit bulls" to be adopted out, and does not encourage folks to rescue "pit bulls" either. So, untold numbers of these dogs continue dying in our shelters. Since the point is to save their lives, we should probably think about what we're saying about the dogs most in need of our help - the ones not raised in loving, responsible environments since puppyhood.
A better phrase would be something to the tune of: a dog's environment and owner management impacts a dog's behavior.
3. The elitist: Pit bulls are the best dog ever! No, they're not. Don't get me wrong, I've met some amazing "pit bulls" via my rescue and advocacy work, but I've also met some annoying or otherwise distateful (to me) ones that I'd never want in my home. Same goes for every breed (and mixes too!) out there. Dogs are individuals and the goals of fighting breed discriminatory laws are to put them on an even playing field, not a pedestal. Pointing out that they're the "best" makes it seem as though they're different. And the reason BDL exists and is upheld is because the argument that they are different has held up in court and convinced lawmakers!)
4. The mudslinger: Picking on other breeds. My question is always: Why? Most people in the US do not own "pit bulls," even if they are incredibly popular. So why are we alienating other dog owners? BDL really is a dog issue not a "pit bull" issue, and the more non-pit bull owning folks we can get on our side, the better. It makes the movement generalizable and more credible. Plus, we don't need to bring down other breeds in order to save the "pit bull." Finally, we never know what the impact of allegations on other breeds might bring: what if someone picked up on our negative statements and then tried to ban a different breed?
5. The historian: Discussing or Debating the "history" of the "pit bull" is problematic as this topic is conentious and not set in stone, even among knowledgeable advocates. Part of the problem is that we still don't know what a "pit bull" is today, needless to say how it was defined 100-200 years ago. Allegations of Nanny Dogs and fighting dogs and working dogs fly around wildly. But, quite frankly, it doesn't matter at all what the history of the breed is. Most breeds have evolved in a totally different direction than their history indicates. Plus, it's entirely possible to change the inclinations of an animal in just a few generations, as shown in the Russian fox experiments. So, for the purpose of fighting breed discriminatory laws, history is a red herring. Leave it be, or risk alienating other advocates who have a different opinion on the "pit bull's" origins and who might otherwise have been allied with you.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Deconstructing a Dog Bite Media Report
Those of us who study dog bite incidence look for underlying patterns of human behaviors, environment, and canine characteristics that manifest themselves in every attack. And, as insinuated, these patterns do exist, although it is not yet certain that they paint a complete picture of any bite incident nor is it apparent that any one factor necessarily causes a dog to bite.
What is clear, however, is that media reports consistently lack information necessary for researchers and viewers/readers alike to decipher the "why" element of a dog bite.
Perhaps more harmful than the blood-and-guts stories that weave bias into these "fair and balanced" reports are the details that are left out - and there are a lot of them. Now, I understand that a reporter cannot always gather all pieces of pertinent information before the story itself becomes untimely and, consequently, obsolete. But it is possible for the reporter to indicate that the information is relevant, but missing.
From Theory to Practice
Below is a new story, featured yesterday, here. I do not intend, by my deconstruction, to minimize the tragedy or seriousness of events like this, because I do take them very seriously. I merely wish to point out the rich details that are reported juxtaposed with gaping factual holes left unfilled - holes that, to the average reader, go unnoticed as hypothetical information is classified as irrelevant to understanding. My comments are in red.
LAKE MARY, Fla. -- A Seminole County family is mourning the loss of a pet after they say a pack of pit bulls [Breed ID is never a necessary or relevant piece of information in a dog bite story. Further, there are no photographs or any other indication of how "breed" identity was confirmed; thus, it should not be included as a fact in this story] attacked and killed their dog.
The scene was so chaotic that a Lake Mary police officer actually shot two of the pit bulls to death.
Authorities say three pit bulls ran loose [this IS a relevant piece of information - already we see an irresponsible owner played the principal role in this incident] and grabbed a Bedlington Terrier named Chewy. [But what the story fails to tell us is whether Chewy was off his leash or, really, anything about Chewy's location or actions immediately preceding the attack].
"There's a lady out here. She's being attacked by a bunch of dogs. She's screaming. There's blood. She's asking for help, but I'm not going over there," a frightened 911 caller said, too scared to leave her home.[C'mon now, really? In a side bar? This fact is irrelevant, used only to provoke emotion and sensationalize the incident; it's also inaccurate, as no woman was attacked. Thanks, media, for detracting from the solemn, serious nature of this tragedy by turning it into entertainment].
The pit bulls' owner tried to stop the attack but could not.[So, did the dogs escape their yard, were they leashed, how and why was the owner present?]
"The next door neighbor was trying to get her dog off of my dog and couldn't do it," said James Brabb, Chewy's owner.
"The three pit bulls, once they got the pack mentality going, they mauled my dog," he said. [Again, extraneous fact, and problematic because it represents that Chewy's owner possesses some sort of authoritative opinion on canine behavior, pit bull behavior in particular. This certainly is not "unbiased" reporting].
Two of the three pit bulls involved in the incident were shot to death by the officer responding to the scene because they got aggressive with him. The offer said he hit the dogs with a baton, but to no avail.
"As the dogs aggressively approached me, I was in fear for my safety," the officer wrote in the report.
Animal services said a citation would be issued. Lake Mary police say it has answered eight complaints about the home since June. [YIKES! eight complaints! And none of these prior incidents resulted in a bite. The owner irresponsibility factor is now off the charts, and we can see the system of laws designed to protect people and their dogs has failed; Chewy should be alive, because these dogs should have been taken from their owners, and the owners heavily cited, months ago].
No one answered the door Wednesday at the home where the pit bulls lived.
What else is missing?
Other than the missing information I indicated in red when appropriate, the following facts were not present or accounted for in this report.Simply indicating the unavailability of the information below would allow readers to recognize that the story is lacking information critical to a full understanding of the incident.
1. Where did this incident occur (one someone's property, on the street)?
2. Were the dogs altered?
3. Where did the dogs primarily reside (outside, inside, chained, penned)?
4. Has the owner received any other animal-related citations?
5. Had Chewy had any prior contact with these dogs?
6. Had the dogs been involved in any prior incidents with humans or other dogs
7. Were the dogs ill or injured at the time of the incident?
Conclusion
Chewy's death was tragic - and more so because it could have been prevented. We must champion for stricter, breed-neutral laws that target irresponsible owners - laws that speak to the confinement, care, and living conditions of the dogs in our communities.
We must also always remember that the information we do not know about a serious dog bite is as important as the information that we do know. Tens of millions of dogs live in the US peacefully, and without incident. We cannot hope to fully understand and thus prevent dog attacks unless we have a complete set of information concerning these incidents.
Hold media accountable.
Make your voice heard.
What is clear, however, is that media reports consistently lack information necessary for researchers and viewers/readers alike to decipher the "why" element of a dog bite.
Perhaps more harmful than the blood-and-guts stories that weave bias into these "fair and balanced" reports are the details that are left out - and there are a lot of them. Now, I understand that a reporter cannot always gather all pieces of pertinent information before the story itself becomes untimely and, consequently, obsolete. But it is possible for the reporter to indicate that the information is relevant, but missing.
From Theory to Practice
Below is a new story, featured yesterday, here. I do not intend, by my deconstruction, to minimize the tragedy or seriousness of events like this, because I do take them very seriously. I merely wish to point out the rich details that are reported juxtaposed with gaping factual holes left unfilled - holes that, to the average reader, go unnoticed as hypothetical information is classified as irrelevant to understanding. My comments are in red.
LAKE MARY, Fla. -- A Seminole County family is mourning the loss of a pet after they say a pack of pit bulls [Breed ID is never a necessary or relevant piece of information in a dog bite story. Further, there are no photographs or any other indication of how "breed" identity was confirmed; thus, it should not be included as a fact in this story] attacked and killed their dog.
"There's a lady out here. She's being attacked by a bunch of dogs. She's screaming. There's blood. She's asking for help, but I'm not going over there," a frightened 911 caller said, too scared to leave her home.[C'mon now, really? In a side bar? This fact is irrelevant, used only to provoke emotion and sensationalize the incident; it's also inaccurate, as no woman was attacked. Thanks, media, for detracting from the solemn, serious nature of this tragedy by turning it into entertainment].
Brabb says Chewy did hold on until his daughter came home from school.
"When Chewy heard her voice, he kind of picked his head up a little. His breathing picked up. Within a minute it had stopped. He had passed. I think he was waiting for her to say goodbye," Brabb said.
Even now, the surviving dog cannot be declared vicious.[And, should not, without proof that this dog itself was actually one of Chewy's attackers. Simply because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time is not good enough for me, especially when a dog's life is in the balance. It's also not good enough for the law in many jurisdictions, including here in WA state].
"Florida statutes require that the animal be involved in more than one attack before we can deem the dog dangerous," said Morgan Woodward with Seminole County Animal Services.
What else is missing?
Other than the missing information I indicated in red when appropriate, the following facts were not present or accounted for in this report.Simply indicating the unavailability of the information below would allow readers to recognize that the story is lacking information critical to a full understanding of the incident.
1. Where did this incident occur (one someone's property, on the street)?
2. Were the dogs altered?
3. Where did the dogs primarily reside (outside, inside, chained, penned)?
4. Has the owner received any other animal-related citations?
5. Had Chewy had any prior contact with these dogs?
6. Had the dogs been involved in any prior incidents with humans or other dogs
7. Were the dogs ill or injured at the time of the incident?
Conclusion
Chewy's death was tragic - and more so because it could have been prevented. We must champion for stricter, breed-neutral laws that target irresponsible owners - laws that speak to the confinement, care, and living conditions of the dogs in our communities.
We must also always remember that the information we do not know about a serious dog bite is as important as the information that we do know. Tens of millions of dogs live in the US peacefully, and without incident. We cannot hope to fully understand and thus prevent dog attacks unless we have a complete set of information concerning these incidents.
Hold media accountable.
Make your voice heard.
Saturday, December 3, 2011
Murders vs Maulings: what we fear does not reflect the facts
In 2010 and 2009, the most recent years for which reliable, fully-investigated information is available concerning dog bite fatalities, 33 and 31 humans respectively were fatally injured by dogs. Most of these dogs were resident dogs, socially isolated in backyards or on the end of chains; many of the fatalities involved unsupervised children left to wander outdoors or left alone inside with unfamiliar dogs. Many of the dogs had been forced to endure extreme abuse.
Sixty-four human lives is not insignificant, particularly from the perspective of the friends and family members left to pick up the pieces left after these tragedies. But it is not a large number considering the population of humans and dogs in the US (310 million and 70 million, respectively).
Thousands of years of evolution and biological fine-tuning have created a predisposition within humans to fear predator species - and that includes dogs. Media reports with gruesome details of dog attacks recognize this fear, capitalize on it, and perpetuate it. In particular, pit bull attacks will often make national news.
But what about human murder rates? Unless a murder is particularly horrific, murders often don't make the news. They certainly don't make national news. And the standard murder (for lack of a better term) does not initiate a violent emotional reaction and public outcry.
Indeed, it seems from media and citizen reactions, that there is much more to fear from the risk of a dog-bite fatality than a murder.
Of course, this is untrue. Here's a glimpse of the statistics for a few states.
** of these two reports, one was reliably identified as not a pit bull type dog
*The scaled population takes into account the difference in total human vs total canine population nationally. There are approximately 4.5 times more humans than dogs in the US.
Thus, in 2009 and 2010 you were around 250 to 500 times more likely to be murdered by a fellow human than attacked and killed by a dog irrespective of breed. And, if human and dog populations were equal, you'd still be 60 to 100 times more likely to be murdered than mauled to death. Murders are rare occurrences. Dog bite fatalities are rare to the point of being statistically insignificant, particularly at the state instead of the national level. From a statistical perspective, they are purely chance occurrences.
Of the fatalities included in the chart, only four were caused by family dogs, only one of which was even debatably a pit bull type dog. So I will repeat the sentiment I will repeat until the day I die: if we treat our dogs like members of our family, they will always live up to their moniker as man's best friend. And yes, this includes our pit bulls.
Sixty-four human lives is not insignificant, particularly from the perspective of the friends and family members left to pick up the pieces left after these tragedies. But it is not a large number considering the population of humans and dogs in the US (310 million and 70 million, respectively).
Thousands of years of evolution and biological fine-tuning have created a predisposition within humans to fear predator species - and that includes dogs. Media reports with gruesome details of dog attacks recognize this fear, capitalize on it, and perpetuate it. In particular, pit bull attacks will often make national news.
But what about human murder rates? Unless a murder is particularly horrific, murders often don't make the news. They certainly don't make national news. And the standard murder (for lack of a better term) does not initiate a violent emotional reaction and public outcry.
Indeed, it seems from media and citizen reactions, that there is much more to fear from the risk of a dog-bite fatality than a murder.
Of course, this is untrue. Here's a glimpse of the statistics for a few states.
State
|
2010 Murders
|
Scaled 2010 Murders*
|
Dog-bite fatalities (all breeds)
|
Dog-bite
fatalities attributed to pit bull type dogs
|
Arizona |
409
|
90.8
|
0
|
0
|
Florida
|
987
|
219.3
|
3
|
none reliably confirmed, 2 reported**
|
California
|
1809
|
402
|
7
|
2 (confirmed)
|
Texas
|
1249
|
277.6
|
2
|
none reliably confirmed, 1 reported
|
Washington
|
152
|
33.8
|
0
|
0
|
** of these two reports, one was reliably identified as not a pit bull type dog
State
|
2009 Murders
|
Scaled 2009 Murders*
|
Dog-bite fatalities (all breeds)
|
Dog-bite fatalities attributed to pit bull type dogs
|
Arizona |
370
|
82.2
|
1
|
0
|
Florida
|
1034
|
229.7
|
2
|
0
|
California
|
1971
|
438
|
4
|
none reliably confirmed, 2 reported
|
Texas
|
1355
|
301.1
|
5
|
none reliably confirmed, 3 reported
|
Washington
|
194
|
43.1
|
0
|
0
|
*The scaled population takes into account the difference in total human vs total canine population nationally. There are approximately 4.5 times more humans than dogs in the US.
Thus, in 2009 and 2010 you were around 250 to 500 times more likely to be murdered by a fellow human than attacked and killed by a dog irrespective of breed. And, if human and dog populations were equal, you'd still be 60 to 100 times more likely to be murdered than mauled to death. Murders are rare occurrences. Dog bite fatalities are rare to the point of being statistically insignificant, particularly at the state instead of the national level. From a statistical perspective, they are purely chance occurrences.
Of the fatalities included in the chart, only four were caused by family dogs, only one of which was even debatably a pit bull type dog. So I will repeat the sentiment I will repeat until the day I die: if we treat our dogs like members of our family, they will always live up to their moniker as man's best friend. And yes, this includes our pit bulls.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)