What is clear, however, is that media reports consistently lack information necessary for researchers and viewers/readers alike to decipher the "why" element of a dog bite.
Perhaps more harmful than the blood-and-guts stories that weave bias into these "fair and balanced" reports are the details that are left out - and there are a lot of them. Now, I understand that a reporter cannot always gather all pieces of pertinent information before the story itself becomes untimely and, consequently, obsolete. But it is possible for the reporter to indicate that the information is relevant, but missing.
From Theory to Practice
Below is a new story, featured yesterday, here. I do not intend, by my deconstruction, to minimize the tragedy or seriousness of events like this, because I do take them very seriously. I merely wish to point out the rich details that are reported juxtaposed with gaping factual holes left unfilled - holes that, to the average reader, go unnoticed as hypothetical information is classified as irrelevant to understanding. My comments are in red.
LAKE MARY, Fla. -- A Seminole County family is mourning the loss of a pet after they say a pack of pit bulls [Breed ID is never a necessary or relevant piece of information in a dog bite story. Further, there are no photographs or any other indication of how "breed" identity was confirmed; thus, it should not be included as a fact in this story] attacked and killed their dog.
Brabb says Chewy did hold on until his daughter came home from school.
"When Chewy heard her voice, he kind of picked his head up a little. His breathing picked up. Within a minute it had stopped. He had passed. I think he was waiting for her to say goodbye," Brabb said.
Even now, the surviving dog cannot be declared vicious.[And, should not, without proof that this dog itself was actually one of Chewy's attackers. Simply because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time is not good enough for me, especially when a dog's life is in the balance. It's also not good enough for the law in many jurisdictions, including here in WA state].
"Florida statutes require that the animal be involved in more than one attack before we can deem the dog dangerous," said Morgan Woodward with Seminole County Animal Services.
What else is missing?
Other than the missing information I indicated in red when appropriate, the following facts were not present or accounted for in this report.Simply indicating the unavailability of the information below would allow readers to recognize that the story is lacking information critical to a full understanding of the incident.
1. Where did this incident occur (one someone's property, on the street)?
2. Were the dogs altered?
3. Where did the dogs primarily reside (outside, inside, chained, penned)?
4. Has the owner received any other animal-related citations?
5. Had Chewy had any prior contact with these dogs?
6. Had the dogs been involved in any prior incidents with humans or other dogs
7. Were the dogs ill or injured at the time of the incident?
Conclusion
Chewy's death was tragic - and more so because it could have been prevented. We must champion for stricter, breed-neutral laws that target irresponsible owners - laws that speak to the confinement, care, and living conditions of the dogs in our communities.
We must also always remember that the information we do not know about a serious dog bite is as important as the information that we do know. Tens of millions of dogs live in the US peacefully, and without incident. We cannot hope to fully understand and thus prevent dog attacks unless we have a complete set of information concerning these incidents.
Hold media accountable.
Make your voice heard.